Skip to content
Nicolas Cava

You are paying to get back to zero

You are paying to get back to zero. That is what a "full rewrite" is. You burn $300K. You freeze the roadmap. Just to rebuild exactly what you already have...

· 1 min read

You are paying to get back to zero.

That is what a "full rewrite" is. You burn $300K. You freeze the roadmap. Just to rebuild exactly what you already have today.

Your lead dev promises it will take 4 months. It takes 12. Why? Because he is bored. Greenfield code is fun. Reading 5-year-old spaghetti code is painful. So he sells you the rewrite.

"We can't scale with this," he says. Yes, you can. You just don't want to.

The fix is a quarantine.

Isolate the rot. Draw a hard line in the sand. Anything new gets built in a separate, modular monolith. Anything old stays in the legacy one.

The execution:

  1. Set up a reverse proxy to route traffic to the old or new app.
  2. Implement a hard policy: zero new features in the legacy codebase.
  3. Bugs: Fix them in legacy (critical only).
  4. New features: Build ONLY in the new modular monolith.

Enhancements? Rewrite that specific slice. Route traffic there.

Do not build an API between them:

  1. Connect the new app to the old DB. Direct access.
  2. Create new tables for new features.
  3. Treat legacy tables as read-only.

Yes. You create a hybrid monster. Yes. The architecture diagram looks like a fucking mess.

But you ship. You survive. You pay the debt when it matters.

Ugly revenue beats beautiful nothingness.

New notes by email.

A short note when I publish something new. Unsubscribe anytime.

Your developers are busy and the product is stuck?

Book a free 25-minute call to see whether working together makes sense.

Prefer writing? Email me at hello@nicolascava.com. I'll reply within one business day.